英语新闻】[资讯][运动][娱乐][生活][文教][经济][科技][时事]【英语考试】[专四][专八][大三][大四][大六][MBA][自考][公共][高考][中考][职称][初中][高中][笔译][金融][阅读]
留学英语】[GRE][GMAT][LSAT][PETS][TOEIC][出国考试]【TEM英语】[TEM介绍][TEM4指导][TEM4试题][TEM8指导][TEM8试题]
CET英语】[动态][技巧][真题][模拟题][语法][听力][口语][写作][翻译][阅读][词汇]【BEC英语】[动态][介绍][指导][试题][口语][初级][中级][高级][经验]
TOEFL托福】[动态][介绍][指导][真题][模拟题][技巧][词汇]【IELTS雅思】[技巧][模拟题][真题][听力][写作][阅读][词汇][口语][介绍][动态]
英语作文】[小学][初中][高中][大学][四级][六级][考研][指导][中考][高考]【英语故事】[双语][民间][情感][童话][寓言][幽默][传记]
英语笑话】[双语][司法][愚人][成人][儿童][动物][宗教][女性]【娱乐英语】[星座][时尚][英语][影视][幽默][名言][赠言][历史][脑筋][轻松][万花筒][异域][文库]
行业英语】[财会][商贸][外贸][运输][医务][传媒][电信][工程][公务员][法律][政治][技术][其他]【英语学习】[新概念][小笨霖][大学][洋话][疯狂][美国][专题][杂谈][方法][品牌]
生活英语】[旅游][日常][电话][购物][酒店][实用][市民]【工作英语】[简历][求职][商务][办公][会议]【奥运英语】[奥运][体育][术语][人物][运动][奥运知识][体坛][资讯]
法律英语】[涉外][案例][术语][法律]【英语口语】[名人][总统][情景][教程][听力技巧][口语技巧][音标][英语口语][俚语]
英文阅读】[心灵][散文][诗词][原版][文学][短文][少儿][初级][高级][文摘][科普][小说][技巧][双语]【写作翻译】[书信][发表][欣赏][贴士][点滴][写作][写作技巧][日常写作]
词汇语法】[专业词汇][特色词汇][马虎词汇][英语语法][语法技巧][词汇技巧][词海拾贝][分类词汇][新闻热词][日积月累]
您现在的位置: 3edu教育网 >> 英语角 >> 法律英语 >> 涉外文书 >> 正文    3edu教育网,教育第三方,完全免费,天天更新!

How to write a good appellant brief七

分类:涉外文书   更新:2016/6/18   来源:本站原创

    The Perils of Overstatement

    The lawyer, who is prominently affiliated with an elite East Coast institution, should have been careful to adopt a respectful tone toward the midwestern state judges he was addressing. We read the briefs before the case was argued. We concluded that, if the judges thought the issue otherwise close, human nature probably would make them want to rule against the defendant because of his lawyer‘s imperious tone. We are not mind readers, but we do know that the defendant lost on appeal by a 2-1 vote.

    The brief of an appellee or respondent — the “bottomside” brief, in the jargon of appellate practice — has certain special features. The bottomside brief writer has the disadvantage of not being able to introduce the judges to the case and the issues; they will read the topside brief first. But there are advantages too. The party filing second has a target to shoot at: the appellant‘s brief. And, except in cases involving cross-appeals, the bottomside writer has prevailed below on all of the issues before the appellate court; that litigant has the advantages that flow from having already had one decisionmaker agree with its position. The bottomside party wins if the decision below was right on the merits or if appellate issues were not preserved below.

    The first item on the checklist of the writer of the bottomside brief should be to ask: Was each of the arguments now being raised on appeal properly preserved below? Were alleged instructional errors properly objected to? Were the grounds now advanced for overturning evidentiary rulings the same ones offered in timely objections at trial? In a related vein, is the legal theory urged on appeal the same one presented to the trial court and, if not, is there an advantage to be gained from the change?

    -Appellate rules usually give the bottomside brief writer the optio

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 下一页

| 设为首页 | 加入收藏 | 联系我们 | 版权申明 | 隐私策略 | 关于我们 | 手机3edu | 返回顶部 |