Should we only reward the best students? This has been intensely discussed for years. The following are the supporters’ and opponents’ opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your response in about 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your views on the issue.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
It is reasonable to offer prizes to the high-level performers. This is because one needs to pay a greater amount of effort than others in order to earn a higher grade in the exams.
Top performers normally act as a facilitator to encourage other students to work harder and they can create a competitive learning environment at the school. Rendering those elite students rewards like scholarships or honors has been justified as a feasible way to inspire students.
Academic study is also a kind of competition, which should abide by the rule of fairness and reward the best performers.
Those best students are relatively few in a class. If we only pay attention to those high-level learners and ignore the rest of the students, their enthusiasm for study, to a large degree, might be reduced.
It is necessary for teachers to give certain awards to those who put considerable efforts in the study. The extrinsic reward provided to them is a motivator for further study since a sense of accomplishment can boost their confidence and help them get great improvements in later study.
Those who have made improvements in their study should be rewarded because it is a kind of recognition